I know that many people were introduced to the writing of CS Lewis when they were children. Usually this introduction was by way of reading the tales of Narnia. Not so for me. One of the earliest sayings from Lewis still sticks in my memory ; and I have no idea which book it came from. It is this : “Once we have met a new acquaintance, that acquaintanceship endures for all eternity.”
I quote from a near-forgotten memory, but its substance has ever remained ; for his words refer to an insight he had which, although seemingly casual, is quite momentous.
We live in a world where physicality is taken for granted. It is a world of science and technology. It is a world where comparatively few people reflect on their essential natures. Out of sheer habit, when a person thinks of ‘himself’, it is his body that comes first to mind. It is such an ingrained habit that many people think that there is no more to a person than his body.
But it was not always so. When the scientific revolution got under way in about the sixteenth century, people had to break a long-standing habit ; they had to stop thinking of themselves as being spirits ; they had to get out of the habit of thinking of themselves as souls. To think of oneself as a ‘body’ required a conscious effort.
It is Renee Descartes who is most often credited (or blamed) for this shift in thought. But really, he was only the writer who first formulated at length the notion that body and soul were two distinct entities. Not everyone was convinced, of course ; but for nigh on four-hundred years our education system has ensured that, not only are body and soul seen as distinct, but that the soul has no value in what is generally taught. Or at any rate it is taught that the soul is essentially a powerless, ethereal thing.
But are body and soul two distinct entities? Or is it the case that the body is simply a manifestation of the soul? Is the body the soul incarnated? Is the soul really powerless in this very physical world?
It is a modern paradox that so many people believe in the idea that the world is composed of atoms – those utterly invisible, silent, untouchable entities that will never, ever, be sensed by human bodies. And atoms are essentially immortal and may only be rearranged in certain ways. They believe all this and yet they baulk at the idea of a soul, which is also not detectable by our senses and may never be destroyed.
But both atoms and souls are inferable by the experience of introspection and of reason. Why do people believe in the results of some introspections but not in others? Why do they trust reason to tell them one thing but not another?
I suspect the answer lies simply in habits of thinking.
Read Full Post »